© 2010 Brighton Collaboration
We set research standards
The protective effect of vaccines can generally be measured directly by markers of immunogenicity, efficacy or reduction of disease incidence rates. Safety can only be measured indirectly by the absence of adverse events following immunization. The lack of a common terminology and shared understanding of what exactly is under investigation has caused much confusion amoung professionals and everyone considering to be immunized.
In the Brighton Collaboration, we have established a global network of qualified experts with the aim of providing high quality vaccine safety information. We create methodological standards for accurate risk assessment. This includes standardized case definitions of adverse events following immunizations (AEFI), guidelines for collection, analysis and presentation of vaccine safety data, and template protocols for study design.
Through constant development of these tools, we provide investigators with an up-to-date reference for their use. Our aim is that studies conducted using these reference tools will give public health decision makers the most accurate results available.
Case definitions of adverse events
Case Definitions are at the heart of epidemiologic research. We build multidisciplinary teams of volunteers with relevant expertise to create a common understanding of adverse vents following immunization.
Read more.
Guidelines for vaccine safety research
Comparability of data accross trials is key to adding value to the results of individual studies. Our guidelines propose a minimal common denominator for investigators to collect, analyze, and present data on adverse events following immunization.
Read more.
Template research protocols
Precious few researchers fully grasp the epidemiologic nuances of vaccine safety protocol design, as this is a relatively young area. By using our templates, researchers leverage the most experienced minds in vaccine safety and make the results more transparent and comparable.
Read more.
